From 18462cf585009a9c99790eb1d6ab26c406bd6d69 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: gilbertchen Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2017 20:49:53 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Update README.md --- README.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index ae145c3..193bb30 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ The following table compares the feature lists of all these backup tools: ## Performance Comparison with Other Backup Tools -Duplicacy is not only more feature-rich but also faster than other backup tools. The following table lists the running times in seconds of backing up the [Linux code base](https://github.com/torvalds/linux) using Duplicacy and 3 other tools. Clearly Duplicacy is the faster by a comfortable margin. +Duplicacy is not only more feature-rich but also faster than other backup tools. The following table lists the running times in seconds of backing up the [Linux code base](https://github.com/torvalds/linux) using Duplicacy and 3 other tools. Clearly Duplicacy is the fastest by a significant margin. | | Duplicacy | restic | Attic | duplicity | @@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ Duplicacy is not only more feature-rich but also faster than other backup tools. | 12th backup | 7.4 | 12.0 | 21.7 | 37.4 | -For more details and other speed comparison results, please visit https://github.com/gilbertchen/backup-tools-comparison. There you can also find test scripts that allow you to run your own experiments. +For more details and other speed comparison results, please visit https://github.com/gilbertchen/backup-tools-comparison. There you can also find test scripts that you can use to run your own experiments. ## License