From f9ede565ff1780bbee5f88478bc614f6b5abf12e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: gilbertchen Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2017 15:02:08 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Update README.md --- README.md | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 448815e..ae145c3 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -280,7 +280,6 @@ The following table compares the feature lists of all these backup tools: Duplicacy is not only more feature-rich but also faster than other backup tools. The following table lists the running times in seconds of backing up the [Linux code base](https://github.com/torvalds/linux) using Duplicacy and 3 other tools. Clearly Duplicacy is the faster by a comfortable margin. -
| | Duplicacy | restic | Attic | duplicity | |:------------------:|:----------------:|:----------:|:----------:|:-----------:| @@ -297,7 +296,6 @@ Duplicacy is not only more feature-rich but also faster than other backup tools. | 11th backup | 4.6 | 9.1 | 16.8 | 28.1 | | 12th backup | 7.4 | 12.0 | 21.7 | 37.4 | -
For more details and other speed comparison results, please visit https://github.com/gilbertchen/backup-tools-comparison. There you can also find test scripts that allow you to run your own experiments.